The next big thing after cloud computing: PEERCLING…
A lot of people are still getting their head around what can be done with Cloud Computing. However I would like to present the next big thing that will come after cloud computing has gone mainstream. It is called peercling!
What is peercling?
Peercling stands for P2P + Cloud Computing or Peer2Peer + Cloud Computing. Peercling addresses the main problem with Cloud Computing: “Network Outage”. Once we move all critical systems to the cloud, we will be totally dependent on having network connectivity. We can have all the high-availability distributed systems on the server side. If our ADSL, 3/4G, Fiber, etc. connectivity fails it will be a no use at all.
How will peercling solve network outages?
SaaS is all about running the application in the cloud, no client apps are necessary. Peercling will slightly reverse this trend. Computers, mobiles, tablets, etc. will need to install a peercling run-time environment and will have to download peercling apps. Why? A peercling app is your life-line when the network goes down. Let’s take a critical SaaS application like a Point-of-Sale (POS) as a Service. A POSaaS allows retailers to scan bar-codes and present you with the bill of your purchase. What if connectivity goes down? A retailer would be stuck with paper-based accounting.
If that same retailer would have a POS Peercling app then he would have a local copy of the product catalog and he would be able to sell you the items. If the POS Peercling app would have lost connectivity to the Internet but would still see other POS Peercling apps that are on the same LAN [Think multiple checkouts at a supermarket], then all purchases could be automatically backed-up to the other apps so there would be a high-availability alternative should the Internet connectivity break and a POS would crash at the same time. As soon as the Internet comes back up it would be the peercling platform that would synchronize with the SaaS back-end and inform about the transactions that took place while there was a network outage.
So peercling is like a mobile phone app that runs locally and synchronizes with a backend system. However the big difference is that the peercling app also can survive without connectivity. If the LAN is still working then P2P technology is used to distribute data and transcations. Afterwards the peercling platform will bring everything back in sync when the network is back.
However peercling can do more. Imagine a large call center that relies on a CRM in the cloud to have all caller’s data. Every agent would have a CRM peercling client that would store part of the caller’s data locally (in encrypted format). Multiple replicates of the same data would be stored on different agent machines. Everytime an agent makes an update it would both be sent to the CRM in the cloud as well as to the agent machines that store data about the specific caller. Since the data is too large to be stored on one machine, P2P technology is used to distribute it over a large set of agent machines. When the CRM in the cloud goes down or Internet connectivity fails, then local copies will be used to continue offer service to the callers until the cloud is available again.
Why should telecom operators be interested in peercling?
Telecom operators have a unique asset that sets them apart from the rest of the world: Network Quality of Service Control. To avoid networks from going down because of too much illegal file sharing, telecom operators tend to downgrade the maximum speed a P2P app can download. This same mechanism [network policy control] can be used inversely as well. Peercling apps could pay to have network quality of service assured. Peercling apps that would need to move large amounts of data can pay to get QoS levels assurance.
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
Telruptive is changing focus…
Top Posts
The Top Blogs
Want to reproduce a Telruptive post?
Twitter Updates
Error: Twitter did not respond. Please wait a few minutes and refresh this page.
Archives
- November 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- September 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
Disclaimer
All the contents of the Blog, EXCEPT FOR COMMENTS AND QUOTED MATERIAL, constitute the opinion of the Author, and the Author alone; they do not represent the views and opinions of the Author’s employers, supervisors, nor do they represent the view of organizations, businesses or institutions the Author is a part of.
The Author is not responsible for the content of any comments made by the Commenter(s).
While we have made every attempt to ensure that the information contained in this Blog has been obtained from reliable sources, the Author is not responsible for any errors or omissions, or for the results obtained from the use of this information. All information in this Blog is provided "as is", with no guarantee of completeness, accuracy, timeliness or of the results obtained from the use of this information, and without warranty of any kind.
Can you please give more references over this topic?
Hi Sharmillis,
Peercling at this stage is an idea. I have more material on what a solution should look like…
Regards,
Maarten
Interesting idea. Potential is there to scale.
honestly this would be unnecessary because i expect network connectivity will only get better. and not all users will want direct connection to their devices for the p2p connection, it isn’t the safest.
Network connection is good to excellent at the moment but operators are throttling network speeds for P2P because of the overload due to file sharing. The P2P has in recent times be used for secure distributed backup and P2P VPN networks so solutions exist for security. The only thing is that nobody can use P2P at this moment for serious business because of the operator’s QoS throttling. Examples are BBC iPlayer that initially was P2P but had to switch to ordenary streaming because of this…
What I read here is just a “store and forward” approach in order to store then synch data if an app is disconnected from the network. We use this approach for years with mobile applications such as Workforce Management solutions. This is just a matter of having more supplier providing such capabilities.
The real issues for CIOs is to have a better control on their assets, apps and data and this is why they what to centralize everything and minimize the cost of the devices in the field.
You are right that CIO have a problem with the devices that people bring to work, the massive amount of data that is currently generated and the fact that people are demanding software that is closer to mobile apps then to complex enterprise software.
Let me think about solutions for this kind of problems. However Peercling is not aiming to solve this. Peercling allows to provide SaaS 2.0, in which if your SaaS Provider breaks down you can continue with your business.
Masrten